Saturday, July 01, 2006

What do you do when you have less than 50% staffing and recently got a ton of work thrown back at you when the contractor hired to do the job fails?

What do you do when the people who cause these problems still expect you to be able to meet all of the customer's needs and the State and Federal requirements, when you are already doing the work of 3 to 4 persons? Or more?

Policy requires that we see and issued benefits to expedited (emergency, in layman's terms) clients within 24 hours of receiving the application. What if you now only have enough staff and appointment slots to see 30-40 clients per worker per week - but there are more than 120 clients per worker that needed to be seen? We are still required to comply with Federal and State requirements? Who is left to interview them?

An office recently got called down because they did not have the means to interview an expedited applicant. Offices are already scheduling one or more "vacant" caseloads, which means if an appointment didn't show, the other "vacant" one would be put into it's place. Then there are the stand-bys who have to be worked in if they insist. Now you add the expedtied applicants, which can be quite a lot in larger cities. Workers are interviewing more than 4 times their normal caseloads/casebanks. They've lost the work time they used to have to actually complete the cases so the clients wait even longer now. (I do have to say that when I explain the situation to most of mine, they are shocked and then very understanding!) But what really ticks me off is that management expects business as usual, without coming up with a solution for it! Supervisors still expect their staff to maintain standards, when some of them won't even step in to help interview! Those that do stand behind their workers are forced to do things they disagree with, at the threat of their jobs. HHSC wants to blame the workers when they are already pulling more than their fair share. It is and was upper management's decisions that caused so many tenured, excellent caseworkers to go away!

The clients are most definitely suffering - waiting longer, standing all day in line trying to get into an office, etc. but let's not forget about the front line workers. Many are putting in unbelievable hours (how the hell are they coming up with the money to pay all this overtime?) Mandatory Saturdays? Workers staying till almost midnight? Losing time with their families and any kind of a personal life. They are stressed to the max - and then we find out that Workman's Comp is refusing claims due to stress? !

Many of us stay in this job out of loyalty....to our clients, to our co-workers. Others have too much time invested to just walk away, too close to retirement for example. For whateve reason we still hang on, we haven't forgotten about our poor, elderly and disabled. The powers that currently run the State of Texas sure have, though!

What I really don't get though, is that an uproar has not been made about the money involved. Accenture continues to get paid, with no financial penalties for failing to meet their end of the contract, Texas is paying more and more in salaries and training, to get temporary staff who might be there a month or so before finding greener pastures - and of course, this is a revolving cycle. Not to mention the paid overtime that the workers are getting. And now, on top of that, the State is having to pay "retention bonuses" of approx $930 per worker for staying 6 months, and then another payment after another 6 months. Of course, in the long run, it's not much money considering how few workers are left!

That's bad enough - but add in the money that the Feds refused to give us because HHSC went ahead without their approval. And of course, the financial penalties that Texas will now have to pay to the Feds for not meeting quality control standards! (And to think that we "State" workers have been getting Federal Enhanced Funding Bonuses for the State for the past several years - using the so-called antiquated "dinosaur" called SAVERR.) It's good enough for Wall Street. Why is it all of a sudden not good for Texas?

I am no longer proud to say that I work for the State of Texas. But I will not give up on it's citizens, and I certainly hope that we will cast our lost together and make sure that Perry does not get elected!

Friday, June 30, 2006

Dozens lose jobs at Texas Access Alliance in San Antonio

Group of private companies has state contract for controversial new system to help Texans sign up for public assistance

By Corrie MacLaggan

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF


Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Several dozen San Antonio employees of a private contractor hired by the state to help Texans apply for public assistance lost their jobs Friday, according to an internal memo obtained by the Austin American-Statesman.

It was the latest development in the saga of a problem-plagued new system for determining people's eligibility for food stamps and Medicaid. The system launched its pilot phase in Travis and Hays counties in January.

Those who lost their jobs did not meet performance standards, said Jill Angelo, a spokeswoman for the Texas Access Alliance, the group of companies that won the state contract.
"We continue to work on performance, making changes to the pilot program at the state's direction," she said. "That's the point of a pilot — to fix whatever issues the program has."

Angelo confirmed that 15 full-time Maximus Inc. employees and some temporary employees lost their jobs. She would not say how many temporary employees were affected; the internal memo says 59. The workers were responsible for compiling documents for cases.

The temporary employees were in a 90-day probation period; had they met performance standards, they would have been hired, Angelo said.

The move comes three months after state officials announced that they were delaying statewide rollout of the new eligibility system, citing problems with employee training and technical concerns. The system is costing the state $899 million over five years.

In May, Health and Human Services Executive Commissioner Albert Hawkins announced that no new cases will be processed in the San Antonio Texas Access Alliance office until the contractor improves the work there. He also canceled plans to lay off 1,000 state workers, though other jobs had already been eliminated.

Mike Gross, vice president of the 12,000-member Texas State Employees Union and a critic of the privatization plan, said that perhaps the alliance has learned that relatively low-paid, low-skilled workers can't replace experienced state employees.

"The whole project is obviously in trouble," Gross said. "This golden opportunity to make a lot of profit for not much work is not panning out."

In a Friday afternoon e-mail to Texas Access Alliance managers, Maximus Human Resources Director Shar Griffin wrote that managers had reviewed employee performance "in order to ensure the highest quality work for the citizens" of Texas. (I kinda wonder if they're actually doing this to reduce their costs, because it's already come out that they have not made as much profit as they had anticipated!)

"Based upon this review, we made the decision to not extend the employment of some of the staff in San Antonio who failed to meet this performance criteria," she wrote. "This means that going forward, San Antonio site will be a smaller organization than yesterday."

There are 478 employees at the San Antonio office, Angelo said.

Lateesha Guyden was one of those who got a pink slip. Guyden, a single mother of four, had worked full time for Maximus as a supervisor in San Antonio since December. Before that, she depended on public assistance.

"I was so grateful to receive that job," said Guyden, 32.

Now, she says, she'll probably request public assistance again. ( I heard that the client who got a job as a supervivor, possibly this one, was actually very good at her job! Isn't that the point of welfare reform? To move our clients from welfare to work?)

The new eligibility system involves closing some offices where people apply for public assistance and replacing them with call centers managed by the alliance, which includes Accenture LLP and Maximus.

State officials last year projected that Texas would save $646 million over five years but now aren't sure what it will save.

Maximus announced Tuesday that it signed an amendment to its five-year contract with the Texas Access Alliance and expects to earn $320 million, about 14 percent less than planned.

After call centers started taking applications in the pilot area in January, applicants encountered long wait times and spoke to representatives who couldn't answer their questions.

Since April, worker training has improved and hold times have been reduced, said Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the commission. (What about the number of dropped calls? The number of complaints? What about timeliness in the rest of the state? We know accuracy has gone completely out the window!)

State officials are concerned about technical problems. It may be months before the system is rolled out statewide.

cmaclaggan@statesman.com; 445-3548

Accenture opening 350-person office here

Web Posted: 06/28/2006 12:00 AM CDT
William Pack
Express-News Business Writer

A global management consulting and business services company that has made headlines over its contract to privatize Texas welfare reviews is moving into San Antonio with a service center that will employ about 350 people.

Accenture, whose U.S. operations are based in Chicago, announced the expansion Tuesday, saying it expects to have a temporary facility open at 5750 Northwest Parkway by early August and a permanent facility operating by mid-2007.

A spokesman said employee recruitment has begun for a range of workers — from entry-level to senior executives. No timetable had been set, however, for when the operation would be fully staffed.

Officials said the San Antonio center will provide clients with outsourced business-process services, including human resource management, procurement, finance and accounting, and training.

Kevin M. Campbell, Accenture's senior managing director for business process outsourcing, said the center will provide only commercial services and will play no role in the $899 million contract the company has with the state's Health and Human Services Commission to take over the screening of welfare applicants.


More coverage
• Web site: www.accenture.com
• Stock quote: Accenture l Technology

Accenture's handling of that contract has produced harsh criticism from a group of Texas legislators, as well as the threat of financial sanctions from the state commission, which has relieved the contractor of some of its duties.

Computer and employee-training problems have produced confusion and introduced flaws into the application process. Critics say the problems have kept welfare benefits from getting to people who are entitled to them.

Accenture said it is addressing the issues raised by the state.

San Antonio Economic Development Foundation President Mario Hernandez said the local Accenture office won't seek government contracts, but instead strive to expand its outsourcing activities, which have been growing steadily.

The company plans to make the San Antonio office a "showcase facility" and to do many of its own business processing functions here, the economic development chief said, adding, "It will give San Antonio exposure."

Hernandez said the office would consist primarily of highly professional people who would earn about $38,000 a year to start. Accenture was not prepared to discuss pay ranges Tuesday.

The company pointed to the diversity of San Antonio's business environment and the quality and size of its labor pool as the reasons it decided to add the city to its inventory of more than 40 delivery centers around the Americas, Asia and Europe.

The company generated net revenue of more than $15.5 billion for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, 2005. In Texas, the company has more than 3,000 employees, with offices in Dallas, Austin and Houston.

Accenture's decision was the second business expansion announced in San Antonio in two days.

On Monday, Afni Inc., a customer service company based in Bloomington, Ill., said it would open a call center in San Antonio in September and employ as many as 400 people by August 2007.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wpack@express-news.net
Express-News staff writer Nancy Martinez contributed

Monday, June 26, 2006

Poem From A State Employee

Last night while I lay sleeping,
I died, or so it seems.
Then I went up to Heaven
But ‘t was only in my dreams.

But, it seems St. Peter met me,
There at the Pearly Gate.
He said, “I must check your record
So stand right here and wait.

He returned and said, “Your record
Is clouded up with flaws.”
But on earth I see you labored,
For a very worth cause

You fought snow and ice in the winter
And sweated in the summer heat.
You couldn’t afford a big meal
When you stopped for a bite to eat.

I see where you drank whiskey,
And used tobacco too.
Fact is you’ve done lots of things,
That a good woman shouldn’t do.

We can’t have women like you up here,
Your life was full of sin.
Then he read the last of my record,
Grasped my hand and said, “Come on in.”

He took me up to the Big Boss.
Said, “Take her in and treat her well.
She worked for the State of Texas, Sir.
She’s had her share of hell.”

*****************

Note from Blogger:
I don't know who wrote this, but I love it! I wanted to share this with all of you. I hope the author does not mind, and if he/she is reading this, if you aren't afraid of being "identified", feel free to leave your name. Or not, as you wish. Thank you.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

MY RESPONSE TO DABJAB....

All workers across the State are being impacted by this call center plan because
1. We no longer have sufficient staff.
2. TAA cannot do it's job.
3. TIERS is not working!
4. HHSC's statement is "Once in TIERS, always in TIERS"....which means that if a client moves from a pilot area to another part of the state, they have to be worked in the TIERS system. (And for that matter, what good is a system that cannot be modified or changed? "Always in TIERS"????)

And as far as helping people....that's what we've been doing for years! Very effectively I might add! Have you not bothered to see how much money we front-line workers have made for the State of Texas from Enhanced Funding Bonuses from the Feds??? Why don't you do some research into how much the State will now have to pay the Feds for not meeting requirements? Or how much money we have lost in matched dollars from the Feds?

And your friend that got the Pregnancy Medicaid? EVERYONE GETS THE SAME - IN THE OLD SYSTEM! The reason she was allowed to have a "phone" interview for TP40 is because we were allowed to do phone interviews for that program. We are also now "allowed" to do phone interviews for TANF - cash benefits, no face to face, not even a phone interview!

While you're calculating, see if you can come up with the money wasted due to fraud!

HHSC Spins

You know, Hawkins and the gang at HHSC in Austin will never admit their system will not work. I just wonder how many years the taxpayers of Texas are going to allow that group to keep funneling money into a flawed system! They will always turn their "spin" on any statement made against this call center plan.

And how dare they say we are speaking out because the Union lost members? Thanks to Hawkins and his cronies, we are recruiting more and more members every day! The reason we lost members is because 1) they went looking for less stressful jobs and 2) HHSC sent out RIF notices last October to thousands! This was their way to make the front line staff think that it was all over and to give up.

Well - hate to tell you, but those of us "in the know" have not given up, nor will we give up because the State of Texas is doing a very BAD thing! They have taken funds, intended to help our poor, our elderly and our disabled and are rerouting that money to their "buddies" at Accenture, Convergys, Deloitte, etc.

It's coming back to bite them in the a** now....

BTW - Anyone else hear that staff in Midland have been told that they CANNOT refer complaints to the Omnbudsmen's office? Isn't this what that office was set up for? What are you afraid of,or trying to hide, Hawkins and Cronies?????

Transition is tough on state aid workers: Move to privatization is driving many away, so they're paid to stay

[June 24, 2006]

(Dallas Morning News, The (KRT) Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge) Jun. 24--AUSTIN --

Scores of state workers who help people sign up for public assistance are quitting every month, but not Alec Davis.

As the state turns to private companies to process applications, he stays to help tackle a mountain of daily tasks. The problems with the transition are so extensive that the state recently canceled plans to lay off 1,000 workers and scrambled to keep eligibility workers, offering bonuses of nearly $1,900 each.

As a "senior disposition worker," Mr. Davis helps determine who gets food stamps, Medicaid and welfare. The full range of the state's outsourcing experiment lies beyond his field of vision, though his south Austin office tower houses one of the private call centers.

But what he has seen, he said, is "a horrible mess" -- slow computers, long electronic "queues" of applications and mistakes by the private companies' workers that create big hassles for those seeking state aid.

"It's going a lot worse than we thought," he said. "You can't work there and not know it."

Mr. Davis and other veteran state workers face Herculean tasks in helping the state move to privately run call and document processing centers. He agreed to speak candidly about problems that have roiled Texas' revamping of eligibility determination, though he said he speaks only for himself.

State leaders defend the overall privatization project, predicting more efficient services for less cost to taxpayers. And the state's main contractor, a group led by the U.S. unit of Bermuda-based Accenture Ltd., says the transition is smoothing out.

But some of Mr. Davis' colleagues in state field offices also note problems, even though privatization is so far limited to pilot programs in Travis and Hays counties. These workers say job insecurity and changing mandates hurt morale and drive co-workers to quit.

"It's a huge reduction in staff in the last few months," said Bridget Walker, a nine-year caseworker in Dallas. "I have more cases [and] I'm doing longer hours. It is a challenge."

Procedures and plans to roll out the new system change rapidly, causing confusion among applicants and employees, said 16-year caseworker Joan Barasch of San Antonio.

"People's cases are getting shifted around," she said. "It's hard to figure out who belongs to whom. People are having to turn in multiple applications to get taken care of."

State agency chiefs and politicians who defend the new system dismiss critics as shortsighted. The defenders point out that state employee groups have lost members to the outsourcing. They also say advocates of the poor who criticize the changes as poorly planned are overlooking benefits of the call centers, such as fewer trips to a field office and the convenience of applying by phone or Internet.

Mr. Davis, though, quit the Texas State Employees Union a year ago. The 39-year-old, who has spent much of his adult life working for the state, agrees that the old system relied too much on paperwork and in-person interviews. In fact, he jumped into the Austin privatization experiment from a field office in Athens because he wanted to "try something different."

Mr. Davis says that the Legislature's decision three years ago to push privatizing of eligibility services signaled to state workers that "we're expendable," but he still gets "a sense of gratification" from helping the needy.

Anger and guilt over the system's failings have led him to hand out cards urging people with call-center problems to contact state and federal agencies to complain.

"This is just a way to help people tell someone what they've experienced," he said.

Rollout on hold

Start-up problems forced Gov. Rick Perry's administration in April to postpone extending the new system beyond greater Austin-San Marcos. A scheduled start date for the Dallas-Fort Worth area of December is on hold.

If resumed, the rollout would close scores of field offices and shift many signups to four call centers run by Accenture; Maximus Inc. of Reston, Va.; and several subcontractors. The group won the five-year, $899 million contract last summer.

Mr. Davis says a lot of work needs to be done before that happens. He said public debate over the plan has missed key points:

-- The Legislature repeatedly slashed funding for the old system. Today, the state has about a third of the 12,000 permanent eligibility workers it had in 1996. Nearly 1,200 temporary workers have been added, but they're poorly trained. Customer service has deteriorated.

-- State managers should listen to line workers and fix flaws in an unwieldy computer program called the Texas Integrated Eligibility Redesign System.

-- Federally created social safety net programs have very complicated eligibility rules. The vendor's call center operators -- some making $8 an hour -- can't possibly learn the ropes in just a few weeks of training.

"I'm not against the change," Mr. Davis said. But he said he was shocked by the start-up's tumult.

He said his state unit has lost half its workers in five months. He is just now reviewing food stamp applications made in February and March, though they were supposed to have been processed no later than April. He has spoken with aid applicants who had phoned call centers 20 times and still not gotten answers.

To reduce an applications backlog, the state has adopted a "quota" system, he said. Two weeks ago, Mr. Davis said, he and colleagues were required to sign a paper in which they agreed to decide 15 cases per eight-hour shift and work at least five hours a week of overtime. During overtime work, they must finish at least two cases per hour, he said.

But many cases handed to disposition workers are poorly prepared, and the computer program stalls if he and his colleagues add information. He said disposition workers sit in cubicles, and their phone conversations with applicants -- required by federal law to be confidential -- easily can be overhead.

'More work to be done'

Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Commission, said the state believes early flaws can be cured. She said the call centers have reduced wait times and how many callers hang up.

"We want to see them sustain that for some time," she said. Training of call center operators has improved "but there's more work to be done," she said. Ms. Goodman said her boss, Commissioner Albert Hawkins, still isn't satisfied with the Accenture group's work.

"If you're judging the system goals by the performance today, then I can understand why he would think that," she said of Mr. Davis. "Because it's not working the way it should."

She said the seven-year-old computer system was not designed for use in call centers but for a face-to-face interview, conducted after all needed information had been brought to a state field office. The state still believes a "long-term solution" will work, she said.

"It's the interim solution we put in place that's causing problems," Ms. Goodman said.

Jill Angelo, a consultant who recently was hired to speak for the Accenture-led group, acknowledged the early difficulties but said "we are making progress."

Ms. Angelo said the contractor is improving customer service and "call quality."

She noted that another company, Deloitte, built the $300 million computer system. And she promised improvements soon.

Back on the fourth floor of the Southfield Building in Austin, Mr. Davis said he is frustrated but can't chuck his $33,000-a-year job. He said he needs employer-based health insurance because he has diabetes and high blood pressure. Even with the state's relatively generous coverage, he said, he shells out nearly $200 a month for medicine.

Mr. Davis, a Tyler native, holds an associate degree in art, drafting and design from Wade College in Dallas. He worked for two years as an unpaid volunteer at the Athens eligibility field office before getting hired. He toiled three years there as a clerk, 10 as a caseworker.

In 12 of his 13 years with the state, he said supervisors gave him the highest job evaluation -- "superior." The only other time was an "exceeds expectations," he said.

The good ratings mean he's eligible for the retention bonuses -- $930 this month and another $930 at the end of the year.

But Mr. Davis said he would simply settle for less stress.

E-mail rtgarrett@dallasnews.com

RENTENTION BONUSES

Last month, the state offered bonuses to all eligibility workers -- both regular status and temporary -- who have been with the state for at least six months and have not received a bad job-performance evaluation. Here's how the bonuses work:

-- All staff in field offices, including clerks and supervisors, are eligible.

-- A $930 pretax bonus is due this month (or six months after an employee's latest merit raise).

-- A second bonus of the same amount is due six months after the first one.

SOURCE: Texas Health and Human Services Commission


QUESTIONS FROM BLOGGER: What is going to happen to those workers who cannot meet the "quota" of cases completed?

Are these workers actually interviewing clients - or just completing their cases? I would like to note that a skilled caseworker can easily complete 20-30 or more cases within an 8 hour day....we already do that every EOM!

Friday, June 23, 2006

PLEASE READ!

Samm is absolutely right! You all know who your "activists" are in the office and if you don't know who your Union Organizer is, just contact TSEU or ask your local activiust.

http://www.cwa-tseu.org/

Accenture has alot of money to offer our politicians....(Yes, and it's a total shame that our political system is the way it is) but we have VOTES! And in order to have our voices heard, we need to increase our membership in the Union. Our thousands of voices spoken together will be heard in Austin...and the more voices we have, the more power we have!

Been too busy

to post anything, but I'm making time for this. I found out today that my Program Manager is being paid PM salary to scan cases in Austin! My understanding is that was supposed to have been done by a private contractor. Makes me wonder if the HHSC is in such a bind that they had to cancel that contract? Hmmmm.....Makes me wonder alot of other things too!

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Another Letter from the front-line

Received from another front-line worker:

Here is the first part of the letters that I was telling you about from the Midland call center.

This is a long ordeal so I will try and make it as short as possible. The situation was that XXXXXXX wanted to apply for TP40. I believe she received her application online and submitted it by fax or took it to her local office and they faxed it for her (those specifics would have to come from her). Anyway, it was May 4th I believe when the call center states that they received her application. After not hearing anything for several weeks XXXXX went to her local HHSC office in Houston to inquire. She was told she would have to call 2-1-1. That # does not work and she had to call the long distance number to get anyone on the phone. She was told that her case was in processing and that is all they would tell her.

After about four weeks, knowing that I work for HHSC, she contacted me asking for help in finding out what the situation was with her case. I tried calling 2-1-1 from my area and also found that the number was not accessible and had to call the long distance number that they had given to XXXXX. When I got a rep on the phone, I explained who I was and what I wanted to know and was told that she could not give me that information. Again I told her I was employed with HHSC and needed to know the status of the case. She said she would have to ask her supervisor. I just asked her to put the super on the phone and I would get the information I needed from her. She explained the same thing they told XXXXX. The case was in processing and they had no idea why it was taking so long. I explained the fifteen day time frames and she agreed with that but still said she had no idea what was taking so long. She assured me that she would send it for priority processing.

After a couple of days I still did not hear anything and called again. I was told that the case was not sent to priority processing, but they assured me again that it would be. When I called to check again they said the case was completed and sent to some other sector to actually be processed. I asked for a number for that office and had to call there for an additional two days before someone told me the case was actually worked. So I asked for a Medicaid # so that XXXXXX could at least call and make the Dr.'s appointment she needed. They did not have that information. I was then directed to Mr. XXXXXXX who assured me that her case was completed and it was sent into a holding status for the card to be mailed out. He stated if she did not get the card in nine days to call him back. XXXXX received the attached letters the other day with the date of June 12th on them.

I was told her case was completed on June 7th. She has since received her packet so she can pick her primary care physician, etc... but has STILL NOT received her Medicaid card. Please remember her file date is May 4. I called Mr. XXXXXXX back again yesterday and he assured me the case was completed and she would get her card. As of this minute, there is still no card.

The notices that she received as you will see are confusing to the client. I had to look at them for a couple of minutes to figure out that they actually tested her for three programs. The TP48,40, and 55. She sent them to me so I could possibly confirm that she was certified for the 40. They requested information on her car - how much it was worth, etc...when she did not even apply for any programs that was applicable for. The end date for her 40 is also incorrect but to get them to correct that would be worse than getting congress to act. And she has no idea who to contact about it and why should she? This is the worst example of timliness and customer service I have ever seen!! What if she would not have had me to contact for help? What about elderly and mentally challenged people? They are not being helped or cared for at all.

Note from blogger: This was sent to me from a co-worker.

Note the dates:

1010 filed 5-4-06 for TP40 ONLY

Due date (15 work days) = 5-25-06

Case certified 6-12-06.

Now, what would have happened had one of us "state" workers had done this? Do you think this would be allowed? Imagine how many other cases are out there like this one!

I have attached edited copies of the letter this person received. I blocked out her personal information and am posting this WITH HER PERMISSION! I'm a seasoned worker w/ over 10 years in eligibility. The worker who reviewed this letter also has years in eligibility. It took both of us several minutes reviewing the letter before we figured out exactly what it was telling our client. Do they really believe the clients' can decipher this? As stated above, this particular client could not figure out what was going on so we asked a worker about it. What is going to happen to those clients who can't access a worker face-to-face? I know, without looking at the document, I could never have told her what happened!

This is a cluster f***!!!




Friday, June 16, 2006

Who to vote for?

I know TSEU has endorsed Strayhorn, but she makes me nervous. They didn't want to break up the Republican Party so she went Independent. I wonder if she'll revert once elected? She must lean in their direction but how far right?

Bell's recent donation is going to do wonders!

How about some comments? Are we going with TSEU? Or are we going Democrat?

Help me decide, folks.

FSSA outsourcing plan to get more review

MIKE SMITH
Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS - Gov. Mitch Daniels has given a review team more time to consider plans by the state's social services agency to outsource the application process for food stamps and other welfare benefits, his office announced Friday.

The Family and Social Services Administration has been considering plans to award a contract to a private vendor to handle the application process for food stamps, Medicaid and other government safety-net programs. Two groups of companies have participated in the bidding for the contract, estimated to be worth about $1 billion over 10 years.

FSSA had previously been looking at a timetable of completing negotiations with a winning vendor later this month.

Daniels appointed an interagency team in mid-May to review the welfare delivery system and the two responses that FSSA received to its request for proposals to privatize the application process. The governor originally asked the group to conclude its review by mid-June, but now has given it more time.

Daniels spokeswoman Jane Jankowski said there was no specific timetable for completing the review, but said the administration was "looking at weeks, not months."

FSSA's plan to outsource the intake processes for programs benefiting about 1 million children, seniors, disabled and low-income Hoosiers has been under scrutiny because of problems that Texas and other states have run into privatizing similar programs.

FSSA Secretary Mitch Roob has said his agency should outsource the application process because it does it now in haphazard, inefficient and ineffective ways that do not serve the interests of welfare recipients.

Earl Goode, Daniels' deputy chief of staff and chairman of the interagency review team, said it has analyzed enough information to agree that Indiana must modernize its welfare system and that broad solutions proposed by FSSA were sound. But he said the team has not yet concluded how to accomplish that.

Goode said the team has identified some questions and tactical issues it wants to examine further before it makes a recommendation to Daniels about a specific agreement with a vendor to handle the eligibility process. He said the team would continue its efforts until it has either negotiated a proposed agreement for Daniels' review or prepared an alternative recommendation.

The two teams of vendors, one led by IBM and the other by Bermuda-based Accenture LLP, were to have submitted their final responses to FSSA by May 9. The IBM team includes Affiliated Computer Services Inc. of Dallas, which employed Roob as a vice president before he joined the Daniels administration last year.

(Hey! Don't we know them?! - Blogger)

The union that represents at least 5,000 FSSA workers, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees-Council 62, has criticized the privatization plan, saying similar contracts have led to problems in Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming. (You forgot about Mississippi)

The union still represents the workers even though Daniels canceled state collective bargaining contracts when he took office last year.

AFSCME spokesman David Patterson said the union, when it had bargaining authority for the state workers, had proposed modernizing the agency many times but doing it with state employees.

"We're glad the governor has finally realized that this rush to privatize the system was ill-conceived, but the fact remains that more time (for review) will not change the fact that privatization hasn't worked elsewhere," he said.

Texas Democratic gubernatorial nominee visits Beaumont

By JENNIFER AVILLA, The Enterprise
06/16/2006


If elected, Bell plans to try to undo the $899 million five-year contract signed last year between Accenture and the Texas Health and Human Services Commission in a privatization effort to outsource state eligibility and enrollment to Medicaid and other health programs.
____________________________________________________

Brad McClellan, Strayhorn's campaign manager and son, said Bell is twisting Strayhorn's words.
"The recommendation she made on call centers was not to outsource or privatize them. It was to use call centers to make the state more efficient," McClellan said.

Click the link to read the entire article. - Blogger

Recent stories from the Texas Legislature 2006 Special Session

5/21/06: Tax reform finished, but schools worry

5/20/06: Seniors, disabled feel cheated by property tax cut

5/19/06: Perry signs business tax bill in S.A.

5/19/06: Legislators get advice on school reforms

5/14/06: Mothers help set the legislative rules

5/13/06: Legislature approves school funding reform

05/10/06: State takes back aid task

05/10/06: Dewhurst to revive disputed tax cut bill

5/06/06: Senator says she'll scuttle her own school bill

5/05/06: Merit pay is bittersweet for S.A. schools

5/05/06: Senate finds little middle ground in Robin Hood revamp

05/04/06: Storm plan includes felons

05/04/06: Bill would help military children

05/04/06: Bill would help military children

05/03/06: Business tax plan goes to governor

05/03/06: Tobacco legislation watched closely

05/03/06: State tests its readiness with mock hurricane

5/02/06: Business tax increase clears Senate hurdle

5/01/06: Lawmaker says teachers holding out for bigger raise risk losing what's on table

05/01/06: Senate passes business tax

5/01/06: Fredericksburg mayor facing a first — challenger for post

4/30/06: Legislators have a lot at stake in tax talks

4/29/06: Legislature closing in on a raise for teachers

4/28/06: House approves tobacco tax increase

4/28/06: Schools may face toughter sanctions

4/28/06: Bill to cap donations is facing uphill battle

4/28/06: Democrats propose state fuel tax holiday

4/27/06: Bill would cap campaign contributions

4/27/06: State wants more storm relief

4/27/06: Governor bets big by backing tax proposals

4/26/06: Teacher pay raise to go on tax bill

4/22/06: GOP limits the debate to relief

4/22/06: Tax talks yield 'big piece of Swiss cheese'

4/21/06: Groupd rap legislators' focus on tax relief instead of education

4/20/06: 'Get out of Dodge' to get out of Austin?



I just thought this was interesting.
Blogger

How about that timeliness training?

Have you taken that PALMS CBT yet?

I did - and I let them have it! You'll get your chance at the end of the training. What a waste of time! We know the timeframes - we just don't have the time and enough people to do the job. Just another insult!

We had a few more delinquencies this week (and we are not a pilot office) - some because we could not schedule them timely. I know they are required by the Feds to do a corrective action, but this certainly will not correct anything!

Go ahead- tell them the truth when you do yours - We're all mandated to take it. Maybe they'll start to wonder (or a few of them anyway) if they're really doing the right thing.

BTW - I'm not worried about being "identified" because from what I hear, alot of other workers have let them have it too!

Saturday, June 10, 2006

How bad is it getting at HHSC?

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

According to my sources who are still on the inside, it continues to get worse every day. Timeliness is swirling down the toilet, and the corrective action plan is not to change course from an unworkable plan that is doomed to end in disaster, but to make staff take time away from their work to be retrained on Food Stamp timeliness policies... as if the problem was that people didn't know that applications should be worked in less than 5 months.

Also, staff have been working nearly every Saturday, just so as to have a day that they could wrap up cases without the phone ringing off the hook, and people waiting to see them in the lobby... however, it is now being suggested that they make working Saturday mandatory, and that they open up the office and schedule more appointments, thus eliminating the primary reason people have been working on Saturday voluntarily

.What people who have never actually worked cases do not understand (and these seem to be the people making all the decisions) is that you can interview people all day every day, and not certify a single case. To actually issue benefits, you need some time when you are not interviewing people in order to wrap those cases up, make sure that they are correct, and process them. Otherwise you are just spinning your wheels.

It seems that with the election cycle kicking into high gear in the near future, some people are getting nervous about how all of this will affect their chances of re-election. These "solutions" are non-solutions, that only result in giving the appearance of "doing something". It has long been the case that government agencies such as HHSC approach every problem with the assumption that there is no problem that training and a new report cannot fix. However, when you have a complete breakdown, such as we are now seeing, this is something like providing training to the crew of the Titanic on iceberg evasion, after the ship is already sinking. It may make some people feel better to know that someone is "doing something", but the "something" they are "doing" is a complete waste of time.

Also, with HHSC trying desperately to hang on to the staff they still have who actually know how to work a case, it seems a rather short sighted approach to burn those people out by insisting that they work 6 days a week, when this will obviously result in lower morale, more unplanned leave, and more people who simply find another place to work.

Personally, I thank God that I am no longer at HHSC, even though I often miss the way it used to be and the people I used to work with. Until they hit bottom, and start actually "doing something" to fix this problem, I can't see why anyone would want to stay that wasn't just hanging on to retire in the next year or two.

posted by Fr. John Whiteford @ 9:56 PM
Monday, June 05, 2006

Friday, June 09, 2006

WOW! It's amazing how many sites you can find about Accenture's ties to the Republicans currently running Texas. Go to your search engine, type in "Accenture Republicans Texas". Below are just a minor sampling.....

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040714/NEWS/407140620/1060

http://www.cleanuptexaspolitics.com/node/view/479


http://www.soapblox.net/colorado/showDiary.do?diaryId=799
Who got Accenture those contracts? by: pacified January 04, 2006 at 19:51:51 America/Denver
Emulating the national GOP's love of incompetence and cronyism, the Owens Administration has recently had quite the PR debacle over its sweetheart deals to Bermuda-based off-shoring king Accenture.
First, Accenture was contracted to update the Labor Department's computer system. They failed, leaving the state with nothing but a $35 Million bill. Then, it was the canceling of the $10.5 Million contract to build Colorado's statewide voter file. And let's not forget last week when Governor Owens released an official 'Thank You' card to Accenture for failing to deliver, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars.
This all begs the question: who got Accenture these deals? Alan over at Progress Now has the answer, unraveling a mystery that starts at Drew T. Durham, former Colorado HAVA director.
pacified :: Who got Accenture those contracts?

Opinion: Plan Puts Cuts Above Children's Programs

State Sen. Eliot Shapleigh

Special to the San Angelo Standard Times
6/8/2006

The tax proposals passed this special session continue the 10-year pattern in both Washington, D.C., and Austin of the ''Great Texas Tax Shift,'' in which the wealthiest Texans' taxes are shifted onto the backs of middle- and low-income families, and budgets for key programs like the Children's Health Insurance Program, college loans and public education get cut.

The total tax relief in Gov. Rick Perry's tax plan for those who make less than $54,000 is zero. In fact, those Texas families will pay $7 million more in net taxes. For Texans who make more than $100,000, their taxes are cut a total of $920 million. The governor's priorities are clear: tax cuts over kids.

After 10 years of the George W. Bush era in Texas and six in the nation's capital, we now know the pattern: tax cuts for the wealthy few, budget cuts for you and deficits as far as we can see. During this era, Republicans have worked every session to shift taxes from wealth to work, from the rich to the middle class.

How does this work? Under Bush and Perry tax plans, wealthy donors get big tax cuts, middle-class families get the price of a tank of gas, then the resulting cuts to budgets destroy programs like CHIP that benefit millions of working Texans.

In 2003, Republicans balanced the state budget on the backs of children by cutting CHIP, Medicaid and after-school programs. As of this April, more than 213,000 children have been kicked out of CHIP. Texas already had the highest rate of uninsured children in the U.S. with 21 percent lacking health care coverage - dramatically higher than the national rate of 12 percent.

The result of the tax shift and program cuts is that income has steadily become concentrated in the hands of the wealthy. Texas started the 21st Century with the greatest income inequality in the nation between the richest 20 percent of income earners and the middle 20 percent.

The Texas model has moved to D.C., where Congress recently agreed on and voted out a tax cut package that overwhelmingly favors the wealthy.

In today's politics of the right, tax cuts are valued over children and budget cuts are valued over good teachers. After a decade of right-wing leaders, Texas ranks 50th among the states for high school graduation rates and 48th in the country in SAT scores, and Texas' per-pupil expenditures recently dropped from 35th to 38th in the nation.

If we as a free people do not rise to elect leadership to meet the challenges of educating our children and investing in our future, for the first time in Texas history, we face a tomorrow less prosperous than today.

Shapleigh, a Democrat from El Paso, has served in the Legislature since 1997.

Misdirected Applications Found

Amy Smith
Austin Chronicle
6/8/2006

Hardly a week goes by without Accenture drawing fire for one snafu after another as the lead player in the state's privatization experiment with public assistance services. The Houston Chronicle added a barrel of fuel to the controversy with last week's report that at least 144 applications from needy Texans mistakenly ended up at a warehouse in Seattle.

The reason? Accenture, the Bermuda-based outsourcing giant on the receiving end of the $899 million contract, listed the wrong fax number when it instructed folks where to send applications for Medicaid, food stamps, children's health insurance, and other services. The documents included the applicants' personal information, such as Social Security numbers and medical histories - not the sort of details you'd want to end up in the wrong hands, much less a warehouse in the Pacific Northwest.

It took months before the case of the missing applicants was straightened out, meaning Accenture and the Health and Human Service Commission didn't commit to get to the bottom of the mystery until reporter Polly Ross Hughes started poking around and asking questions. In light of this latest revelation, the Texas State Employees Union has stepped up its public demands for state officials to follow the lead of several other states and yank the Accenture contract.

"If state employees had compromised confidential information like this, they would be fired in a heartbeat. The same standard should apply to Accenture," said TSEU Vice-President Mike Gross.

Privatization doesn’t sound so bad.

Hey guys, you can comment on this story in Indiana. Please write them and tell them the real story about privatization here in Texas. It isn't just that we were trying to do a computer system at the same time. There is more to it than that -- like state employees know what they are doing and the private contracts can't seem to get it together!


By Laurie Berkshire

" One thing about privatization, it provokes some strong opinions! Indiana is going full-throttle into privatization, beginning with the toll road and continuing with the food stamp program. It doesn’t sound so bad to me....."

The sender says: To read the rest of the story, go to

http://www.theheraldbulletin.com/columns/local_story_156152254.html