Saturday, July 01, 2006

What do you do when you have less than 50% staffing and recently got a ton of work thrown back at you when the contractor hired to do the job fails?

What do you do when the people who cause these problems still expect you to be able to meet all of the customer's needs and the State and Federal requirements, when you are already doing the work of 3 to 4 persons? Or more?

Policy requires that we see and issued benefits to expedited (emergency, in layman's terms) clients within 24 hours of receiving the application. What if you now only have enough staff and appointment slots to see 30-40 clients per worker per week - but there are more than 120 clients per worker that needed to be seen? We are still required to comply with Federal and State requirements? Who is left to interview them?

An office recently got called down because they did not have the means to interview an expedited applicant. Offices are already scheduling one or more "vacant" caseloads, which means if an appointment didn't show, the other "vacant" one would be put into it's place. Then there are the stand-bys who have to be worked in if they insist. Now you add the expedtied applicants, which can be quite a lot in larger cities. Workers are interviewing more than 4 times their normal caseloads/casebanks. They've lost the work time they used to have to actually complete the cases so the clients wait even longer now. (I do have to say that when I explain the situation to most of mine, they are shocked and then very understanding!) But what really ticks me off is that management expects business as usual, without coming up with a solution for it! Supervisors still expect their staff to maintain standards, when some of them won't even step in to help interview! Those that do stand behind their workers are forced to do things they disagree with, at the threat of their jobs. HHSC wants to blame the workers when they are already pulling more than their fair share. It is and was upper management's decisions that caused so many tenured, excellent caseworkers to go away!

The clients are most definitely suffering - waiting longer, standing all day in line trying to get into an office, etc. but let's not forget about the front line workers. Many are putting in unbelievable hours (how the hell are they coming up with the money to pay all this overtime?) Mandatory Saturdays? Workers staying till almost midnight? Losing time with their families and any kind of a personal life. They are stressed to the max - and then we find out that Workman's Comp is refusing claims due to stress? !

Many of us stay in this job out of loyalty....to our clients, to our co-workers. Others have too much time invested to just walk away, too close to retirement for example. For whateve reason we still hang on, we haven't forgotten about our poor, elderly and disabled. The powers that currently run the State of Texas sure have, though!

What I really don't get though, is that an uproar has not been made about the money involved. Accenture continues to get paid, with no financial penalties for failing to meet their end of the contract, Texas is paying more and more in salaries and training, to get temporary staff who might be there a month or so before finding greener pastures - and of course, this is a revolving cycle. Not to mention the paid overtime that the workers are getting. And now, on top of that, the State is having to pay "retention bonuses" of approx $930 per worker for staying 6 months, and then another payment after another 6 months. Of course, in the long run, it's not much money considering how few workers are left!

That's bad enough - but add in the money that the Feds refused to give us because HHSC went ahead without their approval. And of course, the financial penalties that Texas will now have to pay to the Feds for not meeting quality control standards! (And to think that we "State" workers have been getting Federal Enhanced Funding Bonuses for the State for the past several years - using the so-called antiquated "dinosaur" called SAVERR.) It's good enough for Wall Street. Why is it all of a sudden not good for Texas?

I am no longer proud to say that I work for the State of Texas. But I will not give up on it's citizens, and I certainly hope that we will cast our lost together and make sure that Perry does not get elected!

Friday, June 30, 2006

Dozens lose jobs at Texas Access Alliance in San Antonio

Group of private companies has state contract for controversial new system to help Texans sign up for public assistance

By Corrie MacLaggan

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF


Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Several dozen San Antonio employees of a private contractor hired by the state to help Texans apply for public assistance lost their jobs Friday, according to an internal memo obtained by the Austin American-Statesman.

It was the latest development in the saga of a problem-plagued new system for determining people's eligibility for food stamps and Medicaid. The system launched its pilot phase in Travis and Hays counties in January.

Those who lost their jobs did not meet performance standards, said Jill Angelo, a spokeswoman for the Texas Access Alliance, the group of companies that won the state contract.
"We continue to work on performance, making changes to the pilot program at the state's direction," she said. "That's the point of a pilot — to fix whatever issues the program has."

Angelo confirmed that 15 full-time Maximus Inc. employees and some temporary employees lost their jobs. She would not say how many temporary employees were affected; the internal memo says 59. The workers were responsible for compiling documents for cases.

The temporary employees were in a 90-day probation period; had they met performance standards, they would have been hired, Angelo said.

The move comes three months after state officials announced that they were delaying statewide rollout of the new eligibility system, citing problems with employee training and technical concerns. The system is costing the state $899 million over five years.

In May, Health and Human Services Executive Commissioner Albert Hawkins announced that no new cases will be processed in the San Antonio Texas Access Alliance office until the contractor improves the work there. He also canceled plans to lay off 1,000 state workers, though other jobs had already been eliminated.

Mike Gross, vice president of the 12,000-member Texas State Employees Union and a critic of the privatization plan, said that perhaps the alliance has learned that relatively low-paid, low-skilled workers can't replace experienced state employees.

"The whole project is obviously in trouble," Gross said. "This golden opportunity to make a lot of profit for not much work is not panning out."

In a Friday afternoon e-mail to Texas Access Alliance managers, Maximus Human Resources Director Shar Griffin wrote that managers had reviewed employee performance "in order to ensure the highest quality work for the citizens" of Texas. (I kinda wonder if they're actually doing this to reduce their costs, because it's already come out that they have not made as much profit as they had anticipated!)

"Based upon this review, we made the decision to not extend the employment of some of the staff in San Antonio who failed to meet this performance criteria," she wrote. "This means that going forward, San Antonio site will be a smaller organization than yesterday."

There are 478 employees at the San Antonio office, Angelo said.

Lateesha Guyden was one of those who got a pink slip. Guyden, a single mother of four, had worked full time for Maximus as a supervisor in San Antonio since December. Before that, she depended on public assistance.

"I was so grateful to receive that job," said Guyden, 32.

Now, she says, she'll probably request public assistance again. ( I heard that the client who got a job as a supervivor, possibly this one, was actually very good at her job! Isn't that the point of welfare reform? To move our clients from welfare to work?)

The new eligibility system involves closing some offices where people apply for public assistance and replacing them with call centers managed by the alliance, which includes Accenture LLP and Maximus.

State officials last year projected that Texas would save $646 million over five years but now aren't sure what it will save.

Maximus announced Tuesday that it signed an amendment to its five-year contract with the Texas Access Alliance and expects to earn $320 million, about 14 percent less than planned.

After call centers started taking applications in the pilot area in January, applicants encountered long wait times and spoke to representatives who couldn't answer their questions.

Since April, worker training has improved and hold times have been reduced, said Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the commission. (What about the number of dropped calls? The number of complaints? What about timeliness in the rest of the state? We know accuracy has gone completely out the window!)

State officials are concerned about technical problems. It may be months before the system is rolled out statewide.

cmaclaggan@statesman.com; 445-3548

Accenture opening 350-person office here

Web Posted: 06/28/2006 12:00 AM CDT
William Pack
Express-News Business Writer

A global management consulting and business services company that has made headlines over its contract to privatize Texas welfare reviews is moving into San Antonio with a service center that will employ about 350 people.

Accenture, whose U.S. operations are based in Chicago, announced the expansion Tuesday, saying it expects to have a temporary facility open at 5750 Northwest Parkway by early August and a permanent facility operating by mid-2007.

A spokesman said employee recruitment has begun for a range of workers — from entry-level to senior executives. No timetable had been set, however, for when the operation would be fully staffed.

Officials said the San Antonio center will provide clients with outsourced business-process services, including human resource management, procurement, finance and accounting, and training.

Kevin M. Campbell, Accenture's senior managing director for business process outsourcing, said the center will provide only commercial services and will play no role in the $899 million contract the company has with the state's Health and Human Services Commission to take over the screening of welfare applicants.


More coverage
• Web site: www.accenture.com
• Stock quote: Accenture l Technology

Accenture's handling of that contract has produced harsh criticism from a group of Texas legislators, as well as the threat of financial sanctions from the state commission, which has relieved the contractor of some of its duties.

Computer and employee-training problems have produced confusion and introduced flaws into the application process. Critics say the problems have kept welfare benefits from getting to people who are entitled to them.

Accenture said it is addressing the issues raised by the state.

San Antonio Economic Development Foundation President Mario Hernandez said the local Accenture office won't seek government contracts, but instead strive to expand its outsourcing activities, which have been growing steadily.

The company plans to make the San Antonio office a "showcase facility" and to do many of its own business processing functions here, the economic development chief said, adding, "It will give San Antonio exposure."

Hernandez said the office would consist primarily of highly professional people who would earn about $38,000 a year to start. Accenture was not prepared to discuss pay ranges Tuesday.

The company pointed to the diversity of San Antonio's business environment and the quality and size of its labor pool as the reasons it decided to add the city to its inventory of more than 40 delivery centers around the Americas, Asia and Europe.

The company generated net revenue of more than $15.5 billion for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, 2005. In Texas, the company has more than 3,000 employees, with offices in Dallas, Austin and Houston.

Accenture's decision was the second business expansion announced in San Antonio in two days.

On Monday, Afni Inc., a customer service company based in Bloomington, Ill., said it would open a call center in San Antonio in September and employ as many as 400 people by August 2007.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wpack@express-news.net
Express-News staff writer Nancy Martinez contributed

Monday, June 26, 2006

Poem From A State Employee

Last night while I lay sleeping,
I died, or so it seems.
Then I went up to Heaven
But ‘t was only in my dreams.

But, it seems St. Peter met me,
There at the Pearly Gate.
He said, “I must check your record
So stand right here and wait.

He returned and said, “Your record
Is clouded up with flaws.”
But on earth I see you labored,
For a very worth cause

You fought snow and ice in the winter
And sweated in the summer heat.
You couldn’t afford a big meal
When you stopped for a bite to eat.

I see where you drank whiskey,
And used tobacco too.
Fact is you’ve done lots of things,
That a good woman shouldn’t do.

We can’t have women like you up here,
Your life was full of sin.
Then he read the last of my record,
Grasped my hand and said, “Come on in.”

He took me up to the Big Boss.
Said, “Take her in and treat her well.
She worked for the State of Texas, Sir.
She’s had her share of hell.”

*****************

Note from Blogger:
I don't know who wrote this, but I love it! I wanted to share this with all of you. I hope the author does not mind, and if he/she is reading this, if you aren't afraid of being "identified", feel free to leave your name. Or not, as you wish. Thank you.

Sunday, June 25, 2006

MY RESPONSE TO DABJAB....

All workers across the State are being impacted by this call center plan because
1. We no longer have sufficient staff.
2. TAA cannot do it's job.
3. TIERS is not working!
4. HHSC's statement is "Once in TIERS, always in TIERS"....which means that if a client moves from a pilot area to another part of the state, they have to be worked in the TIERS system. (And for that matter, what good is a system that cannot be modified or changed? "Always in TIERS"????)

And as far as helping people....that's what we've been doing for years! Very effectively I might add! Have you not bothered to see how much money we front-line workers have made for the State of Texas from Enhanced Funding Bonuses from the Feds??? Why don't you do some research into how much the State will now have to pay the Feds for not meeting requirements? Or how much money we have lost in matched dollars from the Feds?

And your friend that got the Pregnancy Medicaid? EVERYONE GETS THE SAME - IN THE OLD SYSTEM! The reason she was allowed to have a "phone" interview for TP40 is because we were allowed to do phone interviews for that program. We are also now "allowed" to do phone interviews for TANF - cash benefits, no face to face, not even a phone interview!

While you're calculating, see if you can come up with the money wasted due to fraud!

HHSC Spins

You know, Hawkins and the gang at HHSC in Austin will never admit their system will not work. I just wonder how many years the taxpayers of Texas are going to allow that group to keep funneling money into a flawed system! They will always turn their "spin" on any statement made against this call center plan.

And how dare they say we are speaking out because the Union lost members? Thanks to Hawkins and his cronies, we are recruiting more and more members every day! The reason we lost members is because 1) they went looking for less stressful jobs and 2) HHSC sent out RIF notices last October to thousands! This was their way to make the front line staff think that it was all over and to give up.

Well - hate to tell you, but those of us "in the know" have not given up, nor will we give up because the State of Texas is doing a very BAD thing! They have taken funds, intended to help our poor, our elderly and our disabled and are rerouting that money to their "buddies" at Accenture, Convergys, Deloitte, etc.

It's coming back to bite them in the a** now....

BTW - Anyone else hear that staff in Midland have been told that they CANNOT refer complaints to the Omnbudsmen's office? Isn't this what that office was set up for? What are you afraid of,or trying to hide, Hawkins and Cronies?????

Transition is tough on state aid workers: Move to privatization is driving many away, so they're paid to stay

[June 24, 2006]

(Dallas Morning News, The (KRT) Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge) Jun. 24--AUSTIN --

Scores of state workers who help people sign up for public assistance are quitting every month, but not Alec Davis.

As the state turns to private companies to process applications, he stays to help tackle a mountain of daily tasks. The problems with the transition are so extensive that the state recently canceled plans to lay off 1,000 workers and scrambled to keep eligibility workers, offering bonuses of nearly $1,900 each.

As a "senior disposition worker," Mr. Davis helps determine who gets food stamps, Medicaid and welfare. The full range of the state's outsourcing experiment lies beyond his field of vision, though his south Austin office tower houses one of the private call centers.

But what he has seen, he said, is "a horrible mess" -- slow computers, long electronic "queues" of applications and mistakes by the private companies' workers that create big hassles for those seeking state aid.

"It's going a lot worse than we thought," he said. "You can't work there and not know it."

Mr. Davis and other veteran state workers face Herculean tasks in helping the state move to privately run call and document processing centers. He agreed to speak candidly about problems that have roiled Texas' revamping of eligibility determination, though he said he speaks only for himself.

State leaders defend the overall privatization project, predicting more efficient services for less cost to taxpayers. And the state's main contractor, a group led by the U.S. unit of Bermuda-based Accenture Ltd., says the transition is smoothing out.

But some of Mr. Davis' colleagues in state field offices also note problems, even though privatization is so far limited to pilot programs in Travis and Hays counties. These workers say job insecurity and changing mandates hurt morale and drive co-workers to quit.

"It's a huge reduction in staff in the last few months," said Bridget Walker, a nine-year caseworker in Dallas. "I have more cases [and] I'm doing longer hours. It is a challenge."

Procedures and plans to roll out the new system change rapidly, causing confusion among applicants and employees, said 16-year caseworker Joan Barasch of San Antonio.

"People's cases are getting shifted around," she said. "It's hard to figure out who belongs to whom. People are having to turn in multiple applications to get taken care of."

State agency chiefs and politicians who defend the new system dismiss critics as shortsighted. The defenders point out that state employee groups have lost members to the outsourcing. They also say advocates of the poor who criticize the changes as poorly planned are overlooking benefits of the call centers, such as fewer trips to a field office and the convenience of applying by phone or Internet.

Mr. Davis, though, quit the Texas State Employees Union a year ago. The 39-year-old, who has spent much of his adult life working for the state, agrees that the old system relied too much on paperwork and in-person interviews. In fact, he jumped into the Austin privatization experiment from a field office in Athens because he wanted to "try something different."

Mr. Davis says that the Legislature's decision three years ago to push privatizing of eligibility services signaled to state workers that "we're expendable," but he still gets "a sense of gratification" from helping the needy.

Anger and guilt over the system's failings have led him to hand out cards urging people with call-center problems to contact state and federal agencies to complain.

"This is just a way to help people tell someone what they've experienced," he said.

Rollout on hold

Start-up problems forced Gov. Rick Perry's administration in April to postpone extending the new system beyond greater Austin-San Marcos. A scheduled start date for the Dallas-Fort Worth area of December is on hold.

If resumed, the rollout would close scores of field offices and shift many signups to four call centers run by Accenture; Maximus Inc. of Reston, Va.; and several subcontractors. The group won the five-year, $899 million contract last summer.

Mr. Davis says a lot of work needs to be done before that happens. He said public debate over the plan has missed key points:

-- The Legislature repeatedly slashed funding for the old system. Today, the state has about a third of the 12,000 permanent eligibility workers it had in 1996. Nearly 1,200 temporary workers have been added, but they're poorly trained. Customer service has deteriorated.

-- State managers should listen to line workers and fix flaws in an unwieldy computer program called the Texas Integrated Eligibility Redesign System.

-- Federally created social safety net programs have very complicated eligibility rules. The vendor's call center operators -- some making $8 an hour -- can't possibly learn the ropes in just a few weeks of training.

"I'm not against the change," Mr. Davis said. But he said he was shocked by the start-up's tumult.

He said his state unit has lost half its workers in five months. He is just now reviewing food stamp applications made in February and March, though they were supposed to have been processed no later than April. He has spoken with aid applicants who had phoned call centers 20 times and still not gotten answers.

To reduce an applications backlog, the state has adopted a "quota" system, he said. Two weeks ago, Mr. Davis said, he and colleagues were required to sign a paper in which they agreed to decide 15 cases per eight-hour shift and work at least five hours a week of overtime. During overtime work, they must finish at least two cases per hour, he said.

But many cases handed to disposition workers are poorly prepared, and the computer program stalls if he and his colleagues add information. He said disposition workers sit in cubicles, and their phone conversations with applicants -- required by federal law to be confidential -- easily can be overhead.

'More work to be done'

Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Commission, said the state believes early flaws can be cured. She said the call centers have reduced wait times and how many callers hang up.

"We want to see them sustain that for some time," she said. Training of call center operators has improved "but there's more work to be done," she said. Ms. Goodman said her boss, Commissioner Albert Hawkins, still isn't satisfied with the Accenture group's work.

"If you're judging the system goals by the performance today, then I can understand why he would think that," she said of Mr. Davis. "Because it's not working the way it should."

She said the seven-year-old computer system was not designed for use in call centers but for a face-to-face interview, conducted after all needed information had been brought to a state field office. The state still believes a "long-term solution" will work, she said.

"It's the interim solution we put in place that's causing problems," Ms. Goodman said.

Jill Angelo, a consultant who recently was hired to speak for the Accenture-led group, acknowledged the early difficulties but said "we are making progress."

Ms. Angelo said the contractor is improving customer service and "call quality."

She noted that another company, Deloitte, built the $300 million computer system. And she promised improvements soon.

Back on the fourth floor of the Southfield Building in Austin, Mr. Davis said he is frustrated but can't chuck his $33,000-a-year job. He said he needs employer-based health insurance because he has diabetes and high blood pressure. Even with the state's relatively generous coverage, he said, he shells out nearly $200 a month for medicine.

Mr. Davis, a Tyler native, holds an associate degree in art, drafting and design from Wade College in Dallas. He worked for two years as an unpaid volunteer at the Athens eligibility field office before getting hired. He toiled three years there as a clerk, 10 as a caseworker.

In 12 of his 13 years with the state, he said supervisors gave him the highest job evaluation -- "superior." The only other time was an "exceeds expectations," he said.

The good ratings mean he's eligible for the retention bonuses -- $930 this month and another $930 at the end of the year.

But Mr. Davis said he would simply settle for less stress.

E-mail rtgarrett@dallasnews.com

RENTENTION BONUSES

Last month, the state offered bonuses to all eligibility workers -- both regular status and temporary -- who have been with the state for at least six months and have not received a bad job-performance evaluation. Here's how the bonuses work:

-- All staff in field offices, including clerks and supervisors, are eligible.

-- A $930 pretax bonus is due this month (or six months after an employee's latest merit raise).

-- A second bonus of the same amount is due six months after the first one.

SOURCE: Texas Health and Human Services Commission


QUESTIONS FROM BLOGGER: What is going to happen to those workers who cannot meet the "quota" of cases completed?

Are these workers actually interviewing clients - or just completing their cases? I would like to note that a skilled caseworker can easily complete 20-30 or more cases within an 8 hour day....we already do that every EOM!